User talk:Asig15317

Welcome!

Hello, Asig15317, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Note: signatures should only be used in Talk pages, not article body. Your contributions are credited in the article history. Good luck, ask me something if you like. trespassers william (talk) 10:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Billy Eckstine with female fans, 1950.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Billy Eckstine with female fans, 1950.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Billy Eckstine, Life magazine.jpg Billy Eckstine with female fans, 1950.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Billy Eckstine, Life magazine.jpg Billy Eckstine with female fans, 1950.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent warning mistake

Hello, I recently left you a warning here for adding an inappropriate link to an article. I made a mistake with that revert and warn and have undone my changes. Sorry for any inconvenience I caused. Happy editing! 🔄️TryAgainSooner🕑 🗣️ 17:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mississippi John Hurt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Smith. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blind Willie Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Recordings.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited With a Smile and a Song (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regal Records.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dwayne Dolphin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nathan Davis and Sam Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re-welcome

I did a modest upgrade on your edit to the Phil Schaap article. It was a good addition. It's now formatted as a footnote. It'd be great to have you as 'a little more of an editor' so your contribution(s) -- I've only seen the one, a cursory glimpse -- have a better chance to survive and thrive as contribution(s) to the encyclopedia.

Welcome! Swliv (talk) 14:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Not sure what Phil Schaap article you refer to. Asig15317 (talk) 21:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dwayne Dolphin

You just reverted, without explanation, my removal of unsourced material from Dwayne Dolphin. As I stated in my edit summary, we need reliable sources and the lead should summarise the body (WP:LEAD). Please include reliable sources for this content if they exist and remove the content if such sources don't exist. I also see that you mark all of your edits as 'minor'. This should be done only for edits such as fixing typos. And please also include an edit summary – this will help other editors who follow a page. EddieHugh (talk) 16:26, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eddie. That Dwayne leads his own group and is an important member of Roger's is public knowledge. One can check Google to affirm this. I don't feel that I have to source that information.

One can add to the lead: that in addition to his long career, he leads his own group, the Dwayne Dolphin Fo'Tet and is a mainstay in Roger Humpries RH Factor. Or, something like that. Source only information prohibits direct experience.

If you don't feel that it belongs in the lead, put that information in the body of the bio. Asig15317 (talk) 00:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We do need reliable sources; direct experience doesn't count (this is even the case when the subject of an article comments on content). From the reliable sources page that I linked to: "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians, who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves." Even more direct is the No original research policy: "Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." EddieHugh (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]