Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renown Coaches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Renown Coaches

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guidelines for companies and organisations. No independent refs containing significant coverage and none found in searches. SK2242 (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Bilorv (talk) 19:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article reads like an advertisement, and fails to establish why this company is notable.TH1980 (talk) 03:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- It looks like this comment was intended for another AFD; most of the article is a history section and list of routes and doesn't look at all like an advertisement. Peter James (talk) 16:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- No one has put forth any sources to show that this passes WP:NCORP--Rusf10 (talk) 22:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a lot of these references are dead. References supplied do not give WP:SIGCOV - they are all departmental notices, etc. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Renown Coaches

zproxy.org