Talk:Doxing
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Doxing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Israel-Hamas war protests in the United States was copied or moved into Doxing. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
| Text and/or other creative content from this version of Canary Mission was copied or moved into Doxing. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Legal Para-Dox
editIt is no surprise that you can't spell the word Paradox without "dox," which fits in the field of the paradox of the court, in which most lawyers can't agree on the legality of doxing, which had lead to many published reliable sources to have a divided opinion, which some might consider as doxing to be illegal, or some consider it to be legal, but highly unregulated. Let me know many reliable sources that supports these claims. Am I wrong, or it's just that many reliable sources have a more advanced knowledge on the law and the court. - 𓆩♡𓆪𝘚𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘢𓆩♡𓆪 ・ ︶꒦꒷ 💬・✏️ ꒷꒦︶ 06:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Title and spelling
editStumbleannnn, please self-revert your edits. A basic Google search proves you wrong about doxing being a misspelling. An article should not be moved again after someone objected per WP:RMUM. StephenMacky1 (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- mamy many people would agree with the move. Doxing is a misspelling and literally all of earth uses the word "doxxing" and not "doxing" Stumblean! Talk ☏ (he/they) 10:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Then start a requested move and prove that is the case. It is not a misspelling if it is used by dictionaries, academic sources and other types of sources. StephenMacky1 (talk) 10:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Please read what it says in WP:RMUM
Stumblean! Talk ☏ (he/they) 10:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and it seems unlikely anyone would disagree with the move
- I disagree with the move, so like I said, you should initiate a RM. StephenMacky1 (talk) 10:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Please read what it says in WP:RMUM
- Then start a requested move and prove that is the case. It is not a misspelling if it is used by dictionaries, academic sources and other types of sources. StephenMacky1 (talk) 10:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Why does the title here now have a full stop at the end of the word? Martinevans123 (talk) 11:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- I've reverted the move, per WP:RMUM. A move is contested if it is reverted, spelling should now be discussed before any future moves. Happily888 (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- As the entire premise of this incident was a claim the single-x spelling is not in common usage, let's be clear that both are common and thus appropriately included in the article:
- Oblivy (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
"Ddox" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Ddox has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 9 § Ddox until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:01, 9 February 2025 (UTC)